🔗 Share this article

The count of reserved positions for Māori representatives on New Zealand councils will be cut by over 50%, after a divisive legislative amendment that required municipal councils to submit the future of hard-won Māori seats to a public vote.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which can include multiple councillors based on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to provide Māori electors the option to elect a guaranteed Indigenous council member in municipal and provincial governments. Originally, councils could only create a Indigenous seat by first putting it to a community referendum in their region. Local populations frequently devoted considerable time generating local support and urging their councils to create Māori wards.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To address this concern, the previous Labour government permitted municipal authorities to set up a Māori ward without initially mandating them to subject it to a popular ballot.

But in 2024, the current administration reversed the change, saying local residents ought to determine whether to establish Indigenous representation.

Referendum Results

The coalition’s law change required councils that had created a electoral district under Labour’s rules to hold binding referendums concurrently with the municipal polls, which ended on 11 October. Out of 42 local governments participating in the referendum, 17 voted to retain their seats, and 25 to abolish theirs – revealing many regions against reserved Indigenous seats.

The results provided “a vital step in restoring local democratic control.”

Critics however have condemned the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the coalition government has ushered in sweeping rollbacks to policies designed to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has said it wants to end “race-based” policies, and asserts it is committed to enhancing results for Māori and every citizen.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the public votes were divided down urban-rural lines – six of the seven urban centers mandated to hold referendums backed Indigenous seats, while countryside areas leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to hit their stride.”

Electoral Participation and Concerns

This year’s municipal polls recorded the smallest electoral participation in 36 years, with under one-third of citizens casting a vote, leading to demands for reform.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Differential Standards

Local governments are permitted to create other types of electoral districts – such as countryside seats – without initially mandating a public vote. The different conditions applied to Indigenous representation indicated the administration was targeting Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark referred to the 17 regions that voted to retain their wards.